J'avais déja joué a médiéval total war il y'a des années. Si vous êtes a la recherche d un jeu de guerre genre action passez votre chemin je pense. Pour les amateurs de jeu de gestion stratégie c'est parfait ! Me parece un abuso que el DLC "Blood and gore" sea de pago, debería venir en el propio juego.
To conclude with, it's a good game and enjoyable with a time period full of history
Also, if your micro is good enough, with the skirmishers you can easily defeat heavy armies. What I like at Rome 2 is the time period, the campaign map has a low resolution, but it's good. I should also add that the unit cards are horrible, the player has to be able to make the distinction between the units. The AI in the Emperor Edition is better than the one in the original game, but still too far from perfect. I have played the game with eight players on lowest settings and I can't get more than 20 fps. Also, the running speed is the same on light and heavy troops, there are too few playable factions without having to buy the downloadable content, which in my opinion is too expensive for what it has to offer.
The generals and the skill tree are horrible, they gain traits way too fast, the speed of units in battle is too fast and the height of the troops are all the same. It's not perfect, but it's how Rome 2 should have been when it was launched. When the game was launched, I had like 30 fps on ultra, being unplayable for me, but now I have like 50-60 fps with fifteen thousand soldiers on the map, with the same settings. Seriously, this thing is 30000×4087.Sincerely I was disappointed by Rome 2 at the beginning, it had low resolution and no polish whatsoever, but now, with Emperor Edition, the game is actually good. Perhaps more notably, there’s this ridiculous image from the Battle of the Nile that does a tremendous job of capturing the sheer scale at play in Rome II.